The McKinsey Quarterly

close Visitor Edition

McKinsey Quarterly is the business journal of McKinsey & Company.

Register to read this article

  • Recommendations (1)
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

In defense of the US current-account deficit

Technological change generated both prosperity and the trade gap. Neither its continuation nor its decline would be likely to have catastrophic effects.

Last year, for the third year in a row, the US current-account deficit set a record—this time at more than $400 billion.1 Will this soaring deficit jeopardize the economy?

We don’t think so. There is nothing inherently good or bad about a current-account deficit—or surplus. The rapid increase in today’s deficit merely reflects the extraordinary economic growth of the US economy during the 1990s as compared with the rest of the world. But to understand why the present state of affairs shouldn’t be alarming, you must first understand its underlying cause.

Three explanations are commonly offered for the growth of the deficit. Each has different implications for the economy.

  1. Consumption boom: A spending binge by US consumers has pushed the personal savings rate down to near zero. At almost every income level, the demand for consumer goods and the appetite for imports have surged. At the national level, borrowing from abroad finances the spending. According to the proponents of this theory, the borrowed money hasn’t been invested to enhance productivity, so future consumption and output may suffer as resources are diverted to service the foreign debt.
  2. Safe haven: The financial crises that rocked emerging markets in 1997 and...

Free Membership

As a free member you can also:

  • Read hundreds of free articles
  • Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts
  • Search our archive

Simply fill in this form

View our privacy policy.
We will not share your e-mail. See details.

* Required

New In:
Embed E-mail