The McKinsey Quarterly

close Visitor Edition

McKinsey Quarterly is the business journal of McKinsey & Company.

Register to read this article

  • Recommendations
  • Text Size
  • Print
  • Download PDF
  • Link to This

Learning from Mexican privatization

What Mexico did—and did not do—can provide valuable insights for countries embarking on privatization programs.



  • We’re sorry, exhibits are not available for this article.

Since 1982, mexico has based its economic strategy on four key principles: sound public finances, trade liberalization, deregulation of industry sectors, and privatization of public enterprises. Indeed, among governments that have deregulated and privatized, few can lay claim to a program as profound and far-reaching as Mexico’s.

Except for the few sectors that remain in government hands, the authorities have liberalized most—including steel, telecoms, banking, airports, electricity, ports, roads and highways, radio and television, and water—with a view to encouraging a stronger role for markets. Discussions are under way that suggest that even education could be liberalized. Exhibit 1 lists the areas open to private investor participation. As a consequence, the public-sector presence in Mexico’s economy has declined considerably since its peak in 1982 (Exhibit 2)—mostly as a direct result of the privatization of state-owned enterprises (Exhibit 3). These sell-offs have produced considerable revenues (Exhibit 4), and have had a dramatic effect on the country’s overall attractiveness to foreign investors (Exhibit 5).

Process

During these years of privatization, the Mexican government’s role has changed from that of an operator of a very diverse portfolio of holdings to a regulator of...

Free Membership

As a free member you can also:

  • Read hundreds of free articles
  • Receive e-mail newsletters and alerts
  • Search our archive

Simply fill in this form

View our privacy policy.
We will not share your e-mail. See details.

* Required

New In:
Embed E-mail